If we asked someone who was not familiar with lifting equipment what is meant by that phrase, they would probably imagine a crane or perhaps a forklift. In fact, there is a wide variety of lifting machines and equipment that includes chain blocks, wire rope slings, webbing slings, shackles, eyebolts, beam clamps, hoists – manual, electrical or pneumatic – each of them designed specifically for certain purposes.
A textile sling perfectly suited for lifting of a smooth steel beam will prove to be totally inappropriate for transporting a load with cutting elements, which could cut through fibres. Wire rope will better cope with the abrasions, yet the use of such a rope will raise another question of the ability of the equipment to move freely along a certain radius. Chains offer great strength and high resistance to temperature or chemicals effects, yet their weight makes them inappropriate for handling loads with fragile surfaces.
Selection of equipment depends on a number of factors. Yet, selecting the most strong piece of equipment will hardly prove effective. In case, when the load is to be handled under unusual circumstances, it may turn out, that there is no need for such a powerful sling or, conversely, that the selected equipment proves unable to cope with the challenge.
Workload Limit – A Must Not to be Exceeded
Each lifting machine or device is supplied with a technical specification that states a safe workload limit (Working Load Limit/Safe Working Load) for each type of handling equipment. This information is crucial when designing the equipment, as it gives the manufacturer an opportunity to estimate all the parameters, necessary for making the product.
There is one thing that makes the situation a little more complicated. The rated capacity may vary according to the configuration of the device. For instance, the carrying capacity will differ when the load is lifted straight up in comparison with the load, transported in the choker or basket configuration.
Professional riggers easily determine the load capacity by intuition. Yet, when estimating the load capacities, it is essential to understand the geometrical principles of calculating the lifting load and how the load is transferred from one point to another.
Usually, things tend to get wrong at this point when the rigger underestimates the effect that angles, multiple leg or load dynamics have on the actual load capacity of the equipment.
Effective Inspection Programmes
Almost everyone understands that lifting equipment should be inspected regularly. Yet, very few companies manage to stick to strict inspection schedule. It seems as if some of them know what they should do and what equipment they should purchase. However, they seem to be not able to implement these measures into practice.
Daily visual inspections take just several minutes and detect all obvious damage, deformations, rust. Periodic inspections, performed as prescribed by the legislation and equipment technical specifications, presuppose checking equipment for hidden damages, chains for elongation or internal damage to the lifting sling.
The companies with good safety records have a tendency to stick to rigid inspection schedule and record all inspections in logs. They never use their equipment without tagging and logging. Moreover, whenever a certain piece of equipment passes unsuccessful inspection, it gets immediately taken out of circulation.
Human Factor – The One You Never Discuss
Apart from selection and maintenance of lifting equipment, there is one important issue, which cannot be ignored. People, who actually perform the lift, carry an enormous responsibility that cannot be substituted by any piece of lifting equipment or equipment of any quality.
Professional operators, who know the load weight and its centre of gravity well, tend to feel something is wrong when performing lifting operation. This intuition helps operators to detect potential malfunction at an early stage. Those workers, who have years of experience behind themselves, always stop a job as soon as something suspicious happens and do not insist on proceeding with the job.
Thus, it should be remembered that equipment is only a tool and its maintenance does not guarantee safety, when the operator lacks experience or knowledge about load dynamics.
Conclusion
Good companies, those who operate their lifting equipment with great efficiency, have certain features that distinguish them from others. First, they buy lifting equipment according to their specific needs and requirements. Second, they follow the established inspection routine strictly, even when it is hard. Third, they give special importance to training of their personnel.



